Frequently Asked Questions

Si Math AI is a comprehensive learning platform for SAT, ACT, and EST Mathematics that combines educational expertise, AI technology, personalized learning, analytics, and human support to help students improve their understanding and performance.

It is not a chatbot with a mathematics theme. It is a complete learning system — diagnosis, instruction, targeted practice, full mock examinations, progress measurement and human support — in which artificial intelligence is the delivery engine rather than the substance.

No. Artificial intelligence is one engine inside a much larger educational system. The platform combines educational expertise, years of SAT, ACT and EST mathematics teaching experience, teaching methodologies, learning psychology, exam strategies, performance analysis, weakness analysis, personalized learning paths, human educational experience, software engineering, and AI.

The positioning in one line: artificial intelligence is how Si Math AI teaches, educational expertise is what it teaches, and human experience is why it works.

Experienced educators and exam specialists. The teaching methods, worked explanations, catalogue of common student mistakes, exam strategies and the sequencing of concepts were all created by people who have taught American Diploma students through full preparation cycles.

Zero, the AI mentor, does not invent educational strategies. Zero delivers educational knowledge that specialists created, reviewed and continuously improve.

It is built for one specific job: helping a student raise their SAT, ACT or EST mathematics score by finding what they actually get wrong and fixing it. If that is your goal, the platform is designed around it end to end — diagnosis, explanation, targeted practice, timed mocks and measurement.

Rather than asking you to take a claim on trust, there is a permanent free tier that needs no credit card. Ask Zero real questions from your own prep book, look at what the Weakness Analyzer finds, and judge it against your own material.

It closes the loop. A normal study app gives you questions; Si Math AI records what every attempt reveals about you, ranks your weak skills by how much they are costing your score, generates practice aimed only at those skills, and re-measures afterwards to confirm the fix held.

That diagnostic layer — step three of the loop — is what most tools lack, and it is the reason practice on this platform compounds instead of repeating.

Mathematics only, for three examinations: SAT Math, ACT Math and EST Math. The platform deliberately does not cover other subjects or other exam sections.

The approach would generalise, but we will not expand into a subject until we can bring the same depth of genuine subject expertise to it. Breadth without expertise would contradict the reason the platform works.

Primarily American Diploma students preparing for the mathematics section of the SAT, ACT or EST, predominantly in Egypt and the wider MENA region.

Within that: students beginning a preparation cycle, students retaking an exam to raise a mathematics score, independent learners studying without a private tutor, students who understand mathematics better in Arabic or Franco, parents who want measurable evidence of progress, and schools or tutoring centres supplementing classroom instruction.

No. Si Math AI runs in a web browser on phone, tablet or computer. There is nothing to download and nothing to keep updated.

Zero is the AI mentor inside Si Math AI — a fictional guide character, represented as a dragon, and not a real person. Zero is the tutoring layer: it explains problems step by step, offers a second approach when the first does not land, reads photographed questions, and explains why wrong answer choices are wrong.

Zero delivers teaching methods that human educators authored and review. Zero is the interface to that expertise, not the source of it.

No. Zero is a fictional AI mentor character created for the platform. Si Math AI never presents Zero as a human being. The human expertise in the platform belongs to the educators and exam specialists who authored the educational content Zero delivers.

Si Math AI is the name of the platform. Zero is the name of the AI mentor inside it. When you see "Si Math AI" it refers to the whole learning system; when you see "Zero" it refers specifically to the mentor you talk to.

Educational Expertise — years of SAT, ACT and EST mathematics teaching experience, teaching methodologies, common student mistakes, exam strategies, score-improvement technique and learning psychology.

Technology — artificial intelligence, software engineering, learning analytics, adaptive learning, performance tracking, weakness analysis and personalized recommendations.

Human Support — real educators, mentorship, student guidance, continuous improvement and the human experience behind the technology.

Si Math AI serves students in Egypt and the wider MENA region, and is priced in Egyptian pounds. The platform is built specifically for American Diploma students preparing for international examinations under the conditions those students actually study in.

There is a permanent free tier that requires no credit card, and it is genuinely useful on its own rather than a time-limited trial. Paid plans and credit packs unlock fuller use of the AI mentor and the wider platform. Current prices are listed on the pricing page.

The course is complete on its own. Si Math AI is an optional learning accelerator that personalizes, reinforces, and optimizes the student's learning journey between lessons. It does not replace teaching; it extends and amplifies it.

They answer two different questions. The course answers How do I learn Mathematics? Si Math AI answers How do I learn Mathematics in the smartest and most efficient way possible? The course is responsible for teaching. Si Math AI is responsible for optimizing the learning journey around it.

No student's success should ever depend on purchasing an additional product, and that is a constraint on what we are allowed to build rather than a reassurance. There is a permanent free tier with no credit card, so the honest way to decide is to use it alongside the course for a week and see whether the diagnosis tells you anything your own judgement did not.

The course teaches. Si Math AI accelerates learning. The Si Math course is a complete, standalone educational programme in SAT, ACT and EST Mathematics, taught by human educators — it teaches the mathematics in full and needs no software to work.

Si Math AI is what runs between the lessons. A great teacher explains; a great educational system follows the student after the lesson ends. The teacher delivers knowledge; Si Math AI turns knowledge into long-term mastery — it makes sure today's lesson is still remembered three weeks from now.

Artificial Intelligence is not the teacher. It is the learning accelerator.

No, and the distinction matters. Extra practice is more of something a student already has. Si Math AI is an educational operating system that works between lessons — it decides what is worth doing, not merely supplying more of it.

Between one lesson and the next it continuously answers: what should I study next; why do I keep making this mistake; which topic gives me the biggest score improvement; am I actually improving; am I ready for the exam; and what should I revise today instead of wasting hours.

A student is not buying more mathematics. They are buying a smarter learning process.

No. The Si Math course teaches the mathematics in full, and students prepared successfully through it before Si Math AI existed. A student who never opens the platform is a fully served student, not a half-served one.

The platform exists because some educational tasks are continuous rather than instructional — remembering every mistake over months, detecting forgotten concepts, measuring long-term progress. Those are not teaching responsibilities; they are continuous educational support responsibilities, and they belong to the weeks between lessons. It is an accelerator, and we will not build a feature that makes the course incomplete without it.

They are different kinds of tool, built for different goals. ChatGPT is an excellent general assistant, it explains mathematics well, and using one to check a step of algebra is sensible. But a general assistant is missing six things a full preparation cycle requires, and these are properties of a system rather than of a model: it has no memory of you between conversations, it does not know which of the three exams you are sitting, it cannot aggregate your attempts into a diagnosis, it cannot tell you what to study next, it has no measurement of your progress, and its explanations are not reviewed by an educator.

Si Math AI supplies all six, and delivers teaching methods that specialists authored. The full, honest comparison — including what general AI genuinely does better, and when you should use it instead — is on Why Not Just ChatGPT?

For many things you should. A general AI model is built to answer almost any question across almost any subject; Si Math AI is built to guide one student's complete learning journey in SAT, ACT and EST Mathematics. Different tools, different goals.

If you want a question explained, a general assistant will serve you well. If you want to know which specific skills are costing you marks, practise exactly those, sit properly timed full-length mocks, and see whether months of study are actually working, that is a learning system rather than an assistant. Many students use both — see Why Not Just ChatGPT? for the full comparison.

No, and we would not claim otherwise. General AI assistants are genuinely good at explaining and solving mathematics problems. The difference between them and Si Math AI is not intelligence — it is scope of purpose. A general assistant is not designed to hold a diagnosis of one student across months of preparation, to know which of three examinations that student is sitting, or to decide what they should study next week.

That is not a claim Si Math AI makes, and it is not really the right question. The difference is the learning system, not the intelligence of the underlying model: educational expertise, assessment, analytics and human mentoring combined around the AI. The value comes from the integration of those components rather than from asserting a superior model.

Si Math AI is not a chatbot at all — a chat interface is one component of eight. The other seven are the Weakness Analyzer, Focus Practice, Mock Exams, Smart Progress Tracking, Learning Memory, Personalized Learning and Human Support.

A chatbot answers the question in front of it and forgets you afterwards. Si Math AI records what each attempt reveals, ranks your weaknesses, builds practice from them, measures whether it worked, and remembers all of it next time.

You can, and for one-off questions it will often work. What it will not do is tell you, eight weeks before your exam, which four skills are costing you the most marks and what to do about them in what order. That requires persistent, structured data about you and a curriculum to interpret it against — neither of which a stateless conversation has.

Those tools solve one problem at a time, which they do well. They do not know which exam you are preparing for, they keep no memory of your past mistakes, they do not diagnose patterns across your attempts, and they do not explain in Arabic or Franco.

Si Math AI is built around the preparation cycle rather than the individual question.

A good private tutor is highly effective, and the platform is built on the same kind of teaching expertise. The practical differences are availability and continuity: a tutor is available a few hours a week and costs substantially more per term, and weak topics are usually not tracked between sessions.

Si Math AI is available continuously, remembers every mistake, and maintains a running diagnosis. Many students use both — the platform handles diagnosis and daily practice, the tutor handles what benefits most from a human in the room.

No, and it is not designed to. The platform exists because expert teaching is scarce and expensive to deliver one-to-one, not because teaching is unnecessary. Educators authored everything the platform teaches and continue to review and improve it.

Si Math AI extends what educators can deliver to students who would otherwise get no individual diagnosis at all.

Question banks provide volume against a generic syllabus. They do not tell you where you actually stand, and they cannot build a plan from your specific weaknesses — so students tend to practise what feels comfortable, which is usually what they already know.

Si Math AI generates practice from a live diagnosis of your own attempts, and skips skills you have already mastered.

It is a good fit if you are preparing for SAT, ACT or EST mathematics and want to know precisely which skills are costing you marks rather than practising broadly. It is a particularly good fit if you study independently, if you understand mathematics better in Arabic or Franco, or if you are retaking an exam and need to fix specific gaps.

It is not the right tool if you need help with non-mathematics sections, university-level mathematics, or you want answers produced on your behalf without learning.

Three things. First, the educational content is authored and reviewed by experienced SAT, ACT and EST mathematics specialists rather than generated on demand. Second, the platform is organised around a fixed diagnostic taxonomy of 5 topic domains and 33 tracked skills, so weaknesses are measured consistently over months instead of being described in loose language. Third, it is built specifically for American Diploma students in Egypt and the MENA region, including EST coverage and explanation in Arabic and Franco.

We do not make ranking claims we cannot substantiate, and you should be sceptical of any platform that does. What we can describe is what the platform does: diagnose your weaknesses from your own attempts, rank them by score impact, generate targeted practice, run full timed mocks, and measure whether you are improving.

The free tier exists so you can evaluate that yourself rather than take a claim on trust.

Because those students prepare under conditions international tools were not designed for. Many think and reason in Arabic while sitting an exam written in English, many write naturally in Franco, and the EST — which matters enormously for Egyptian university admission — is barely acknowledged by international preparation products. Private tutoring is also expensive relative to local incomes and concentrated in a few cities.

Supporting all three exams at equal depth, explaining in three languages, and pricing in EGP with a real free tier is the specification, not a translation layer over a Western product.

Prep books are a perfectly good source of questions, and the platform is built to work with them — you can photograph any question straight from a book or worksheet with Snap & Solve. What Si Math AI adds is the layer a book cannot provide: diagnosis of what your mistakes have in common, and a practice plan built from it.

You ask a question — typed, pasted, or photographed — and Zero works through it step by step, explaining the reasoning rather than presenting a final answer. If an explanation does not land, Zero re-frames it a different way. It also explains why the wrong answer choices are wrong, because distractors on standardised exams are engineered around specific misconceptions.

Behind the scenes, every interaction writes a diagnostic signal against a specific skill, which is what feeds the Weakness Analyzer.

Yes. Zero is available at any hour, which is the practical difference between a platform and a timetable — most students study late, and questions do not wait for the next tutoring session.

Yes. The feature is called Snap & Solve. Photograph a question from a prep book, worksheet or whiteboard and Zero reads it and works from the image, so you do not have to retype mathematical notation.

Yes. Copy an image, then paste it into the chat box however your device pastes anything else — Ctrl + V on Windows or Linux, Cmd + V on a Mac, or a long press and Paste on a phone or tablet. It attaches exactly as an uploaded photo does and is read the same way: pasting is a shortcut into Snap & Solve, not a separate feature.

Where the picture came from does not matter. A screen capture works — the Windows Snipping Tool (Win + Shift + S) is one example, and every system has its own — and so does right-clicking or long-pressing a picture in your browser and choosing Copy Image.

One piece of browser behaviour is worth knowing, because it is the one case that looks broken and is not. Selecting an image on a page and copying does not put the picture on your clipboard — browsers copy the surrounding text instead, so there is nothing for the chat to attach. Choose Copy Image when you want the picture itself.

Text and images travel together. Copying a passage from a PDF that contains both will paste the text into your message and attach the picture at the same time.

On a phone or tablet the camera and gallery buttons in the chat are the most direct route, and they work in every browser — whether or not that browser offers an image paste.

Yes. Every solution is worked through in sequence at the level of detail the student needs, rather than a final answer with the reasoning collapsed. A correct answer you cannot reproduce is treated as a failure state, not a success.

Ask again. Zero offers multiple approaches to the same problem — same question, different route — until it clicks. Re-framing a concept a different way is a normal part of teaching, and the mentor is designed for it rather than repeating the same explanation more slowly.

Yes, and this is deliberate. On standardised exams the incorrect answer choices are constructed around specific, predictable mistakes. Knowing why a particular distractor is tempting is what stops you selecting it under time pressure later.

No. The platform is built to teach, and there is a scope guard that declines requests outside its educational purpose. The goal of every interaction is that you can solve the next question of that type unaided.

Zero will teach you the mathematics and work through problems with you so you understand them. It is not designed to complete assignments on your behalf, and it declines requests outside its educational scope. If your homework is SAT, ACT or EST mathematics practice, working through it with Zero is exactly what the platform is for.

Yes. The platform carries your exam context between sessions, and it matters: the same topic is approached differently for the ACT's time pressure, the SAT's format and the EST's. A general AI tool has no reason to know which exam you are sitting.

Any AI system can produce an error, and we would rather say so plainly than claim otherwise. Two things reduce the risk here: the teaching methods and explanations Zero delivers are authored and reviewed by exam specialists rather than improvised, and the platform is scoped narrowly to SAT, ACT and EST mathematics rather than answering anything.

If an explanation looks wrong, ask Zero to work it again a different way — and tell us, because specialist review of real student interactions is part of how the content improves.

Yes. Zero is not limited to checking answers — you can ask it to teach a concept you have never covered, and it will build the explanation from the appropriate starting point. If the Weakness Analyzer has already identified the topic as a gap, that context informs how it is taught.

No, and this is one of the most important facts about the platform. Zero delivers educational knowledge created, reviewed and continuously improved by experienced educators and exam specialists. The AI makes that knowledge available instantly and personally to every student; it is not the origin of it.

Every attempt you make — questions asked of Zero, focus drills, and mock exam items — writes a diagnostic signal recorded against a specific skill in the platform's taxonomy. The Weakness Analyzer aggregates those signals and ranks your weak skills by how much each is costing your score, giving each one a severity band.

The ranking combines how heavily a skill is tested on your exam with how reliably you are losing it, so a frequently-tested skill you fail half the time outranks a rare skill you always fail.

It is the system that replaces guessing about what to study. It tells you which skills are costing you marks, ranked by impact, with the evidence behind each conclusion — the way an experienced teacher would if they could review every attempt you had ever made.

Most students cannot, and this is not a criticism. The topics that feel hardest are often not the ones losing the most marks, and the errors that actually cost points — a sign dropped under time pressure, a word problem mistranslated into an equation — are close to invisible from the inside. Diagnosis needs an outside view of many attempts.

Si Math AI is organised around a specialist-defined taxonomy of 5 topic domains and 33 tracked skills: Algebra (12 skills), Geometry (8), Probability & Ratios (6), Statistics (5) and Functions (2).

Algebra, Functions, Geometry, Statistics, and Probability & Ratios. Each contains individually tracked skills — for example Algebra covers order of operations, exponents, radicals, polynomials, complex numbers, linear equations and inequalities, among others.

It resolves to individual skills rather than broad topics. A student who fails a quadratics question has usually not failed at quadratics — they have failed at factoring, or sign handling, or translating a word problem into an equation. The taxonomy is built to record that distinction.

Because a diagnosis is only as good as the vocabulary it is expressed in. Without a fixed taxonomy, "quadratics", "quadratic equations" and "solving by factoring" would fragment into three unrelated records and no pattern would ever be visible. Every signal is mapped to one permanent skill identifier before it is stored.

A four-level band attached to each diagnosed weakness so the ranking is readable at a glance. It tells you what is urgent versus what is merely imperfect, which matters when study time is limited.

No. A weakness clears when later evidence confirms the fix held, not on a single correct answer. One right answer after a run of wrong ones is weak evidence, and treating it as proof would produce a diagnosis that flickers rather than one you can plan against.

Yes. Signals are written on every interaction and the ranking updates as evidence accumulates. You do not need to trigger an analysis manually or complete a special diagnostic test.

Focus Practice is a targeted drill list built from your actual diagnosed weaknesses. It generates practice aimed at the specific skills currently costing you points, in the order that recovers the most marks per hour of study.

It is the step that converts diagnosis into action — a diagnosis with no action attached is just a more precise way of feeling bad about your preparation.

Ordinary practice follows a chapter order or a random shuffle. Focus Practice is generated from your live diagnosis, so two students on the same day, both eight weeks from the SAT, receive different drill sets — because they have different weaknesses.

No. It skips skills you have already mastered. Practising a skill already at high mastery is the most comfortable and least useful thing a student can do with study time, so the platform does not offer it.

Yes. Clearing a weakness promotes the next one — the list is a live queue rather than a fixed printout. Every drill attempt also writes a new diagnostic signal, so the practice that fixes a weakness is the same practice that proves it was fixed.

Consistency matters more than length. The platform is built around the position that roughly fifteen focused minutes a day compounds more effectively than occasional long sessions, which is also why daily streaks exist.

Completed sessions earn XP toward the seven-rank ladder, and they maintain your daily streak. The gamification exists because sustained daily practice is the hardest part of a long preparation cycle and deserves visible acknowledgement — it never substitutes for the mastery scores, which are what actually describe readiness.

You can always ask Zero about any topic you want. Focus Practice is the platform's recommendation of where your time is best spent, based on evidence — but it is a recommendation, and studying something because you know you need it is entirely reasonable.

It reads the Weakness Analyzer's current ranking, which is derived from your recorded attempts across chats, drills and mock exams, and adjusts for how much time remains before your exam date.

Full-length, correctly timed SAT, ACT and EST mathematics mock examinations. They reproduce the real format and timing so you practise the exam, not just the mathematics: you sit the paper under real timing, then record your result and the mistakes you made, and those mistakes feed the Weakness Analyzer.

Because practising questions and sitting an exam are different skills. Under real timing, students who know the mathematics perfectly well still lose marks to pacing, fatigue, question triage and the decision of when to abandon a question and move on. A mock is the only way to measure that and the only way to practise it.

Yes — real timing and real format for each of the three exams. Pacing is the clearest example of why that matters: the ACT's per-question budget is a fundamentally different problem from the SAT's or the EST's, and practising one at the wrong tempo trains the wrong habit.

Standardised exams convert the number of questions you answered correctly (the raw score) into the score that appears on your report (the scaled score). Each exam publishes its own conversion, and it shifts between sittings.

Si Math AI does not perform that conversion. In the current Mock Exam workflow you sit the paper under real timing and then record the score your own result or report shows, so what the platform stores is the number you already have rather than one it has calculated for you.

Yes. A mock is evidence gathered under real exam timing, which is what makes it worth recording. It is where a wrong answer caused by time pressure separates itself from a wrong answer caused by not knowing the content — a distinction that is very hard to see any other way.

Yes. The questions you got wrong remain available afterwards, so the mock becomes study material rather than a score you glance at once and forget.

Frequently enough to track pacing and confirm progress, but not so often that you spend your preparation measuring instead of improving. The useful pattern is: take a mock, let it produce a diagnosis, spend the following sessions on Focus Practice against that diagnosis, then take another to check whether it moved.

Yes — SAT, ACT and EST mathematics, each in its own correct format and timing.

Not in the current Mock Exam workflow. What you record for a sitting is the exam you took, your score, and how many questions you answered correctly, wrongly and left blank.

What makes the mock actionable is the mistake log rather than a section split: the topics you record against your wrong answers go into the Weakness Analyzer alongside the rest of your evidence, so the mock changes what you are told to practise next.

A mock result is evidence, and it feeds the platform's predicted test-day score alongside your other performance. Treat the prediction as a planning instrument rather than a guarantee — its value is in the direction it moves and the gaps it exposes, not in the exact number on any given day.

Yes — this is the Learning Memory system, and it is the foundation everything else depends on. Every question you have asked, every session and every mistake is saved, searchable, and carried forward between sessions.

Without persistence there would be no weakness ranking, no trend, no predicted score and no plan.

The persistent record of your learning: full session history that can be reopened, searchable past questions, retained mistake records from chats, drills and mock exams, and the exam context the platform carries between sessions.

A conversation with a stateless chatbot is complete when it ends. Exam preparation is the opposite kind of activity — its entire value is cumulative.

Yes. Session history is searchable, so you can find the question you asked three weeks ago without scrolling through everything since.

Mastery scores for each of the 33 tracked skills, trend lines over time per topic domain, a predicted test-day score that updates as evidence accumulates, plus daily streaks and an XP rank ladder.

It exists to make improvement legible — and to make stagnation legible too, early enough to change what you are doing.

A per-skill measure of how reliably you can currently handle that skill, derived from your actual attempts rather than from how many questions you have completed. Questions completed measures effort; mastery measures readiness.

It is an estimate derived from your performance on the platform, not a guarantee and not an official score. It becomes more informative as more evidence accumulates. Use it as a planning instrument — the direction it moves and the gaps it exposes matter more than the exact number on a given day.

The adaptive layer that connects the other systems. What you practise, the order you practise it in, how a concept is explained, which language you receive it in, which exam everything is oriented around, and what the platform stops showing you — all derived from evidence it has collected about you, and all changing when that evidence changes.

The curriculum is fixed and specialist-authored; the selection and sequencing of it is personalized. That distinction matters: the pedagogy is not improvised per student. It is chosen per student from material educators wrote and reviewed.

A daily streak tracks consecutive days of study. Consistency is the hardest and most predictive part of a long preparation cycle, and the streak is there to make it visible and worth protecting.

XP is earned through practice and moves you along seven ranks: Beginner (0 XP), Learner (100), Solver (300), Scholar (600), Expert (1,000), Master (1,500) and Elite Scholar (2,500).

The ladder is a motivational structure layered on top of measurement. It never substitutes for your mastery scores, which are what actually describe exam readiness.

Yes. Progress is broken down by topic domain and by individual skill, with trends over time, so you can see whether a weakness is genuinely closing or merely being avoided.

Yes — that is the point of the loop. The recommendation comes from your ranked weaknesses adjusted for how much time remains before your exam, rather than from a generic syllabus order.

Yes. SAT Math is covered across all four College Board content domains, in the Digital SAT's two-module adaptive format: Algebra & Linear Equations, Advanced Math & Functions, Problem Solving & Data, and Geometry & Trigonometry.

Yes. ACT Math is covered in its real format — 45 questions in 50 minutes — with speed-focused drilling across Pre-Algebra & Algebra, Coordinate & Plane Geometry, Trigonometry, and Statistics & Probability.

Yes. EST Mathematics is covered at the same depth as the SAT and ACT: Number Theory & Arithmetic, Algebra & Inequalities, Geometry & Measurement, and Data & Probability. Full EST support is one of the reasons the platform was built — it matters enormously for Egyptian university admission and is barely addressed by international preparation products.

Yes. Many students sit more than one, and the platform covers all three. Your diagnosis carries across, since the underlying skills overlap heavily even though the formats and timing differ.

They differ in content weighting, timing pressure, calculator policy and question style. The ACT's 45-questions-in-50-minutes format makes pacing the dominant constraint; the SAT weights algebra and data analysis heavily and routes every student through a second module matched to how the first went; the EST has its own structure and is the exam most relevant to Egyptian university admission.

The same topic is therefore taught differently depending on which exam you are preparing for.

No. The platform covers mathematics only. We would rather do one subject with genuine specialist depth than several without it.

Si Math AI covers SAT Mathematics across the four College Board content domains, in the Digital SAT's two-module adaptive format. For the current format specifics of any exam sitting, always check the official College Board information as well — exam formats are set by the boards, not by us.

No. Si Math AI is an independent preparation platform and has no affiliation with or endorsement from the College Board, ACT Inc., or the organisations administering the EST. SAT, ACT and EST are the property of their respective owners and are referred to here only to describe what the platform prepares students for.

Earlier is better, because the diagnostic loop needs evidence before it can be precise, and fixing a weakness takes practice spread over time rather than a single session. That said, the platform is genuinely useful late in preparation too — a mock exam plus a ranked weakness list is a rational way to spend a final few weeks.

The platform is built around the observation that the gap between a good score and a top score is rarely more content — it is usually four or five specific, identifiable, fixable skills. Finding exactly those is what the Weakness Analyzer is for.

We will not promise a score. No honest platform can, since the outcome depends on your starting point, the time you have and the work you do.

No. We do not publish score-increase guarantees or averages, because we will not claim figures we cannot verify. What the platform guarantees is method: an evidence-based diagnosis of your weaknesses, targeted practice against them, and honest measurement of whether it is working.

It is built for SAT, ACT and EST preparation specifically. There is substantial overlap with American Diploma school mathematics, so students often find it helpful for coursework — but the content, strategies and scoring are oriented around the three examinations.

English, Arabic, and Franco — Arabic written in Latin characters, which is how a great many students naturally write. You receive explanations in whichever you think in.

Because a student who reasons in Arabic should not have to translate before they can learn. Comprehension is the bottleneck in mathematics teaching, and forcing a student to process an explanation in a second language adds a cost that has nothing to do with the mathematics.

Franco — sometimes called Franco-Arab or Arabizi — is Arabic written using Latin characters and numerals. It is a common written register among students in Egypt and the region, and Si Math AI supports it because students actually write that way.

Yes. You can ask for an explanation again in a different language, and Zero will re-frame it. Switching language is one of the ways to get a concept that has not landed to click.

Yes. It runs in a browser on phone, tablet or computer, and the interface is built for the mid-range phones most students actually use.

The platform is a web application, so it needs a working connection, but it is built to be usable on ordinary mobile connections rather than assuming high-bandwidth conditions.

There is a permanent free plan at no cost, plus paid plans and credit packs priced in Egyptian pounds. Current prices are listed on the pricing page, which reads the live price list — prices are deliberately not duplicated across the site so that no page can show a stale number.

Yes, and it is permanent rather than a time-limited trial. It requires no credit card. The free tier exists so that cost is not the reason a student goes undiagnosed.

No. You can create an account and start using the platform without entering any payment details at all. The free tier is permanent rather than a trial that expires and asks for a card, so there is nothing to cancel and no risk of an unexpected charge.

Free access to practice on the platform. Paid plans unlock fuller use of Zero, the AI mentor, along with the wider platform allocation. The current breakdown of what each plan includes is shown on the pricing page.

Credits are how AI usage is metered. Different AI operations — a chat message, an image question, a deep explanation, a study plan, a mock exam, a focus session, a weakness analysis — consume different amounts, because they cost different amounts to run.

The exact cost of each operation is configured centrally and shown in the app, so it is always current rather than a number written into a page.

Because AI operations have a real per-use cost, and pricing that reflects it is the honest way to keep the platform sustainable without raising prices for everyone or degrading the free tier. Metering by operation also means a student who uses cheap operations is not subsidising one who uses expensive ones.

You can buy a credit pack, or upgrade your plan for a larger allocation. Both options are on the pricing page.

Yes. Credit packs are sold separately from plans, so you can top up AI usage without committing to a recurring subscription. Current pack sizes and prices are on the pricing page.

Egyptian pounds (EGP). Si Math AI is built primarily for students in Egypt and the wider MENA region, and prices are set in local currency rather than converted from a foreign price list. Current amounts are shown on the pricing page.

From the pricing page. Upgrade requests are reviewed and activated by a person, with email confirmation within 24 hours — this is one of the places human support is directly involved rather than an automated queue.

Plans are activated and confirmed by email within 24 hours of the request.

No. The platform is funded by subscriptions and credit packs — including founding memberships — rather than by advertising or data resale. That funding model is part of why the free tier can stay genuinely useful.

The Founder Badge is a founding membership of Si Math AI. Founder members receive a 50% lifetime discount that is locked forever for as long as the membership remains active, a permanent Founder badge on their profile, and access to the complete platform. The number of Founder memberships is strictly limited and only 3 remain.

Yes. The 50% discount is a lifetime discount, and the discounted price is locked forever for as long as the membership remains active. Future price increases do not apply to a Founder member. If the membership lapses, the Founder rate is released and cannot be recovered, because Founder membership is now closed.

None. The Founder Badge is closed and no further memberships are being issued. The number was fixed and is not reissued, so there is no second founding round. Existing Founder members are unaffected: their rate and badge continue exactly as before.

A permanent 50% price lock is a lasting commitment against every future price of the platform. Si Math AI can honour that for a small founding group without compromising the free tier or the pace of development, but not for an unlimited number of members. The cap is what makes the lifetime lock sustainable rather than a promise that has to be withdrawn later.

Nothing. Future price increases are locked out for Founder members. The rate agreed at the time of joining remains in force for as long as the membership stays active, regardless of what the platform charges new members later.

A 50% lifetime discount, that discounted price locked forever, all future price increases locked out, a permanent Founder badge on the profile, the complete platform, a full credit allocation for the AI tutor, human support, and a direct line into what gets built — the founding group is small enough that its feedback shapes the roadmap.

Founding members back a platform before it is obvious that it works, and in this case they are trusting a young platform with examinations that genuinely matter to their future. Most companies acknowledge that with a discount that expires in three months. We think the value a founding member provides is permanent, so the recognition should be permanent too.

The lock lasts as long as the membership remains active. If the membership lapses or is cancelled, the Founder rate and the reserved place return to the pool. That is the only condition attached, and there are no others.

No. The number was fixed, it is not reissued now that Founder membership has closed, and there is no second founding round under a different name.

No. Founder membership is closed and no further memberships are being issued. The current plans are on the pricing page, and there is a permanent free tier — start free, use it against your own material, and subscribe only if it earns it.

Create a free account, tell the platform which exam you are preparing for and when, then start asking Zero real questions from your own prep book. The diagnostic layer needs evidence, so the fastest way to a useful weakness ranking is to work through genuine questions rather than exploring the interface.

Yes, in two distinct senses. Real educators and exam specialists author, review and continuously improve everything the platform teaches — that is the deeper form of human support, and it is present in every explanation Zero gives.

There is also direct human help: upgrade requests are reviewed and activated by a person with email confirmation within 24 hours, and account issues are handled by people.

Real educators behind the curriculum and the content review, mentorship and student guidance, continuous improvement driven by how students actually perform, and people handling accounts and upgrades. Human experience is the foundation the technology is built on, not a fallback bolted on afterwards.

Account and upgrade support is available from inside the app once you have an account, and upgrade requests receive an email response within 24 hours.

No. There is no separate diagnostic test to sit — the platform builds your diagnosis from your ordinary work. Ask questions, do drills, take a mock when you are ready, and the weakness ranking assembles itself from that evidence.

Yes, and many students do. The platform handles diagnosis, daily practice and measurement between sessions; a tutor handles what benefits most from a human in the room. They complement each other rather than competing.

Progress — mastery per skill, trends and the predicted score — is visible in the student's account, which is what makes it possible to show a parent evidence of progress rather than a reassurance that study is happening.

Yes. Schools and tutoring centres use it to supplement classroom instruction with the per-student diagnosis a class of thirty cannot produce.

Any modern browser on a phone, tablet or computer. There is nothing to install.

Use the password reset link on the login page; a reset email will be sent to your registered address.

Not unless they are real and the student has agreed to be quoted. A testimonials section was previously removed from the site rather than filled with invented content, and no rating markup is published in our structured data because we have no verified reviews to represent.

An accurate description is worth more to a student deciding whether to trust us than an impressive one.

Because we will not publish figures we cannot verify. Score-increase averages, user counts and success percentages are easy to assert and almost never substantiated. We describe what the platform does and let the free tier demonstrate it.

Your session history, mistake records and progress data exist to power your own diagnosis. The platform is funded by subscriptions and credit packs rather than advertising or data resale.

No. The platform includes a scope guard that declines requests outside its educational purpose, and it is designed so that you can solve the next question of that type unaided. Using it to learn the mathematics behind your homework is exactly what it is for; using it to avoid learning is not something it supports.

No. It is a tutoring and practice platform: it teaches you mathematics, diagnoses your weaknesses and gives you targeted practice. That is the same category of help a private tutor provides. It is not designed to produce work you submit as your own.

Your account and its learning history remain associated with your account. If you have a specific request about your data, contact support from inside the app.

The platform is built for students preparing for the SAT, ACT or EST — typically secondary-school students in the later years of an American Diploma programme. Younger students would find the content aimed above their level.

Educational material is authored by experienced educators and exam specialists and reviewed rather than shipped on model output alone — a plausible explanation is not automatically the right one to teach. Specialists then review how students actually perform and revise the material accordingly. The platform supplies the evidence; people make the judgement.